CleanstoneDevelopmental and independent evidence for machine minds.

Tree F: wetware comparison. Plan

Status 2026-09-30: parked indefinitely. Tree A's ledger failed calibration, so there is no cross-substrate residual to compare. A partner could still run the barrier assay on their platform. No line depends on it. Context: ../../research-plan.md section 2 (Tree F).

Goal

Run the same barrier assay on cultured neurons and on a software model matched for task performance, then compare their residuals under the same ledger. Levin's synthetic-biology origin and the AI programme meet on one bench here and nowhere else.

Hypotheses

Prerequisites

Steps

  1. Define the shared task. The DishBrain Pong or Doom paradigms already have the shape of a barrier task. Inputs, outputs, perturbations and scoring are specified identically for wet and dry.
  2. Partner outreach (todo-operator.md).
  3. Software side. Train a small model to the same task performance under the same feedback protocol, and run the ledger.
  4. Wet side. The partner runs the protocol and we receive traces.
  5. Compare residuals, following a pre-registered analysis.

Decision gates

Cost

The highest of all the trees. It needs partner time, platform fees (FinalSpark charges per access slot) and an ethics review. Not before year two.